Three frameworks the work leans on
Each observatory and priority module is built on at least one of these, to keep the analysis anchored to a few consistent ideas.
The Architecture of Delay
Why institutions that see a risk clearly still fail to act on it in time.
A diagnostic that decomposes the space between warning and action into four sequential gaps — evidence to decision, authority to responsibility, funding to implementation, ambition to capacity — so that a slow response can be attributed to a specific, addressable failure rather than to generalized institutional inertia.
Read the frameworkPreventive Public Goods
Distinguishing spending that reduces future harm from spending that responds to harm already realized.
A reclassification of public expenditure along a second axis. Rather than sorting spending by sector, the framework sorts it by position in the risk cycle — anticipatory or reactive — so that a system's preventive posture becomes visible and comparable over time.
Read the frameworkContributions to Public Goods
A descriptive lens for how corporate actors affect public goods — not a scorecard, rating or ethics classification.
Three separate dimensions — public dependence, systemic importance and public responsibility — applied to corporate actors whose decisions function as public-goods provision or withdrawal. The framework generates research questions; it does not generate a verdict.
Read the frameworkOne sequence, three lenses
- 01
The Architecture of Delay explains why a known risk to a public good goes unaddressed.
- 02
Preventive Public Goods measures whether a system is investing ahead of that risk or only after it materializes.
- 03
Contributions to Public Goods extends both to non-state actors whose decisions now function as public-goods provision or withdrawal.
Together they give every emerging-priority module the same diagnostic sequence: observe the risk, interpret its significance, identify the prevention gap, recommend the options worth testing.